That's weird... I know people reported there were problems with the Steam version, (mostly regarding Sandbox 3 compatibility), but that's no reason to remove the entire game.
Sega thinks they can keep playing on people's nostalgia for their new sonic games, and obviously it hasn't been working. IMO, the last Sonic games that were really good, were Sonic Adventure 1 and 2. If they want to make a truly modern Sonic game, they should make SA3, and just keep the main characters (Sonic, Tails, Knux)
And for god's sake Sega, take some time to develop your games. There's a fundamental difference between the old Sonic Team from the new, an...
I would have put Chrono Cross up there instead of Chrono Trigger, but whatever, it's just a list.
...there's a reason I left MGO. The game was so unbalanced and relies solely on your ability to make headshots. On top of that, they nerfed the already seemingly useless shotgun and got rid of the "box trick"
On the flip side, MGO's steep learning curve will make Uncharted 2/3's multiplayer seem like a walk in the park.
I'd bet money BF3 gets a much higher rating on meta critic.
From what Crytek achieved, with just a PATCH to Crysis 2, is pretty remarkable. You need to see it in person to get a better idea of the difference.
DX11 will shine when games are built up on its interface. BF3 will be the first to take full advantage of the API's.
@Darrius FFXIII didn't really have a good story...
Yeah I was confused by it too. They have RU on Karkand in Battlefield P4F, but he's not referring to that...
Why do you feel as if the consoles are getting a gimped version of BF3? DICE is working to make all versions play as similarly as possible. Resistance, Killzone and Mag ARE NOT running on Frostbite 2. If they were, I guarantee you they would not support the number of players online they do now.
What no blood gulch?
"I can say with confidence
that mw3 will outsell bf3, pre orders dont mean jack"
And I can say with confidence, BF3 will be a much better game than MW3. Sales don't mean jack to gamers.
It's not that simple, it took YEARS for computer hardware to become available that could run Crysis to it's highest quality. I doubt Crytek would go back and optimize their older CryEngine 2 (which was not optimized for consoles, and not even well for PC's) for the 360 or PS3. There are just certain aspects to the first Crysis that I don't think would translate well to consoles. The day/night progression, destructible environments, the large open scale, the final boss battle.....
...So do I.
The resemblance is in the boosters, kickbacks and customization, and the article was saying how these things don't make the game balanced but rather reward players who invest more time.
I don't think there's a need for new consoles. Developers just need to focus more on gameplay than graphics.
I'm definitely gonna get this. I had too much fun playing 16-player LAN matches over Gearbox back in the day to miss this opportunity.
Take note developers, this is how you properly do a remake.
Those look Fantastic!
Now can I see some new XIII versus screenshots please?
"I have a PC that's fully capable of running BF3, but I'm still getting it on PS3."
I'm sorry I just don't understand your reasoning behind that decision.
@BattleAxe Where do you live that the prices are so high? Newegg has an evga gtx 580 for under $500 USD. Get the gtx 560 ti, it's the best bang-for-buck card on the market right now at around $250, and performs second only to the 580 (for nvidia's gpu's)
No, you're worst than that, you're just plain scum.
Sir, I may not brake if I see you crossing the street.